A political commentary piece argues that New Zealand should quit the Paris Agreement due to its failure to account for national realities, especially in agriculture, and calls for an end to emissions pricing and carbon-based policies that harm farming and rural livelihoods.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Yeah, and you mentioned uh senior management and chief executives. The answer is to have a few less of them by combining and hopefully what the government's doing around combining some of these authorities, local bodies authorities might go some of the way to solving the problems, but it's not an easy fix. Okay, the UN has finally changed its climate change disaster modelling. You're going to write to them to ask for a refund for all the New Zealand dollars we've wasted on alarmist policies. Your words, not mine.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
alarmist spending with no tangible returns
The Country 28/05/26: Jane Smith talks to Jamie Mackaydeeply illogical assumptions about emission sources and farming
ACT has put Paris on notice\\ \\ September 3, 2025Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
