At risk

Broadcasting Standards Authority

regulator · also: Broadcasting Standards Authority, BSA, broadcasting standards active

View

At time of publication Live risk score

Risk score

22.0

4/4 stages · 3.00× cadence multiplier

detected 2026-05-09

Latest detector pass on 2026-09-10 reads 2.5 (1/4 stages). View live →

All four stages of the detection model fired for Broadcasting Standards Authority in this window: volume, framing, amplification, and mainstreaming. Risk score 22.0 with a 3.0× cadence multiplier. Volume: 62 items in the last 7 days, against a 3.8 prior-4-week-mean baseline (16.5x ratio). Framing: 62 of 77 framed items (81%) used the delegitimising register rather than substantive criticism. Recurring phrases include "abolition of broadcasting standards authority", "broadcasting act reform", and "broadcasting standard authority removal". Amplification: 7 coordinator orgs were active on these topics in the last 14 days. Mainstreaming: 15 mainstream press articles carrying the delegitimising frame in the last 14 days. The stages fired in tight cadence — the speed multiplier is at the upper end of the scale. See methodology for the four-stage model, scoring formula, and the underlying research.

Cascade

The four stages below correspond to phases identified in the literature on coordinated institutional targeting: an initial mention spike (volume signal), delegitimising framing of the institution’s statutory function, infrastructural amplification by aligned actors, and finally mainstreaming — the laundering of the framing into mainstream press cycles. See the methodology page for thresholds and the underlying citations.

Stage 1 Volume signal — fired

Mention rate across discourse, press, audio, and social rises sharply against the institution's own trailing baseline. Indicates increased attention; does not in itself imply coordination.

67 items in last 7 days (17.9× the 3.8 prior 4-week mean)

Stage 2 Delegitimising framing — fired

Items frame the institution as illegitimate or as overreaching its mandate, rather than engaging substantively with specific decisions. The framing classifier distinguishes this register from substantive criticism, defence, and neutral reporting.

65/80 items grievance-framed (81%)

dominant phrases: abolition of broadcasting standards authority · broadcasting act reform · broadcasting standard authority removal · broadcasting standards and pacific representation · broadcasting standards authority · broadcasting standards authority abolition · broadcasting standards authority disestablishment · broadcasting standards authority jurisdiction

Stage 3 Infrastructural amplification — fired

Multiple actors flagged as coordinator nodes (advocacy / lobby orgs, partisan media, aligned MPs) active on the institution’s topics in a short window. Coordinator-node status is behavioural and admit-gated.

7 coordinator nodes active (7 orgs · 0 people)

Stage 4 Mainstreaming — fired

Mainstream news coverage carrying the delegitimising frame within days of stage 3. Captures the “oxygen of amplification” effect: when the framing crosses from partisan to general-audience outlets.

16 press articles carrying the grievance frame

Topics carrying this institution

Topic	Press	Discourse	Social	Total (90d)
bsa abolition timeline	6	16	42	67
abolition of broadcasting standards authority	20	12	15	49
bsa scrapping impact	4	13	11	31
bsa legislative reform	5	5	3	13
bsa discrimination ruling	1	1	5	7
bsa effectiveness	0	2	5	7
bsa abolition	0	0	5	5
bsa platform moderation	2	1	2	5
bsa jurisdiction over online content	1	1	3	5
constitutional legitimacy of broadcasting standards	3	0	2	5
bsa policy	0	0	4	4
bsa leadership incompetence	0	0	4	4
bsa free speech claims	0	0	4	4
bsa waste of public funds	0	0	4	4
bsa complaint outcome	1	0	3	4
bsa platform integrity	0	0	3	3
bsa bad faith action	0	0	3	3
bsa institutional ineffectiveness	0	2	1	3
bsa mumbo jumbo	0	0	2	2
bsa funding	0	0	2	2
bsa platform bias	0	0	2	2
bsa precedent	0	0	2	2
bsa political relevance	0	0	2	2
bsa internet coverage	0	0	2	2
bsa jurisdictional overreach	0	1	1	2
bsa organisational hypocrisy	1	0	1	2
bsa reporting standards	1	0	1	2
bsa plunket complaints	0	1	1	2
bsa staff redundancy	0	0	2	2
bsa misinformation	0	0	2	2
bsa censure power	0	0	1	1
bsa surveillance	0	0	1	1
bsa media trust	0	0	1	1
bsa findings on decency and privacy breaches	1	0	0	1
bsa comedy policy	0	0	1	1
bsa independence audit	0	0	1	1
bsa septic complaint	0	0	1	1
bsa dissenting opinion	1	0	0	1
bsa calling out plonker	0	0	1	1
bsa inaction on climate	0	0	1	1
te reo māori broadcasting standards	0	1	0	1
bsa platform broadcast decision	0	0	1	1
bsa government dismissal	0	0	1	1
broadcasting standards authority's tikanga critique	0	1	0	1
bsa public display	0	0	1	1
bsa ideological shift	0	0	1	1
bsa meetings	0	0	1	1
bsa media control	0	0	1	1
bsa mission creep	0	0	1	1
bsa transparency	0	0	1	1
bsa coalition governance	0	0	1	1
bsa editorial discretion	1	0	0	1
bsa irony	0	0	1	1
bsa grant podge robertson	0	0	1	1
bsa knife delivery	0	0	1	1
bsa legal fees audit	0	0	1	1
bsa to media council migration	0	0	1	1
bsa threat to sean	0	0	1	1
bsa leadership effectiveness	0	0	1	1
bsa platform collapse	0	0	1	1
bsa uniform controversy	0	0	1	1
broadcasting standards breach	0	0	1	1
bsa sanctions relevance	0	0	0	0
bsa arrogance	0	0	0	0
public trust in bsa	0	0	0	0
bsa institutional legacy	0	0	0	0
bsa executive salaries	0	0	0	0
bsa cultural practices	0	0	0	0
bsa board accountability	0	0	0	0
bsa existential challenge	0	0	0	0
bsa leadership transition	0	0	0	0
broadcasting standards and pacific representation	0	0	0	0
bsa awareness among gen z	0	0	0	0
bsa retention	0	0	0	0
bsa complaint against barry sopera	0	0	0	0
bsa powers expansion	0	0	0	0
bsa ultra vires	0	0	0	0
bsa judicial enquiry	0	0	0	0
bsa revival	0	0	0	0
bsa political corruption	0	0	0	0
bsa tax practices	0	0	0	0
bsa ruling on media ethics	0	0	0	0
bsa sympathy	0	0	0	0
bsa background explanation	0	0	0	0
bsa backfire	0	0	0	0
bsa kill switch	0	0	0	0
bsa departure benefits	0	0	0	0
bsa suppression	0	0	0	0
director conflicts in bsa	0	0	0	0

Detection methodology, stage thresholds, and the political-agnosticism statement are documented at /methodology. Detections don't auto-publish — they pass through an admit gate (human confirm + a written note) before appearing here, and rejections are logged with a reason.

Admit notes on this institution: Validation seed for the at-risk BSA replay test (per the May 2026 article).