Topic · social
Water Quality Standards
7 posts
· 335 engagement
· first seen 2 May 2025
· last seen 15 Jun 2026
The post questions the Labour Government's claim that lowering water quality standards would not compromise safety, implying a lack of scientific basis in their assertion.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 6 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 6 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Positive
2
Neutral
3
Negative
1
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
reddit
1 post
· 232 engagement
232
-
facebook
2 posts
· 89 engagement
89
-
twitter
1 post
· 6 engagement
6
-
youtube
2 posts
· 4 engagement
4
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
reddit
· u/FunClothes
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 154
· ↻ 0
· 💬 26
· 232 engagement
13 Jun
-
facebook
· greenpeace.nz
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 56
· ↻ 5
· 💬 2
· 72 engagement
4 Jun
-
facebook
· greenpeace.nz
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 11
· ↻ 0
· 💬 2
· 17 engagement
15 Jun
-
twitter
· @theplatform_nz
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 2
· 6 engagement
14 May
-
youtube
· @UCAzMKrAq0Cq9o_SaqQlLa3Q
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
12 May
-
youtube
· @UC6II4-F8iHr9dBk6qv7k7xA
· reply
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
28 May