Topic · social
Supreme Court Jurisdiction
4 posts
· 86 engagement
· first seen 25 May 2026
· last seen 18 Jun 2026
A critique of the Supreme Court's proposed retrospective tort legislation, highlighting concerns about overreach and absurd exemptions for ordinary domestic activities.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 4 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 4 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
twitter
4 posts
· 86 engagement
86
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
twitter
· @josephmooneymp
· quote
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 15
· ↻ 4
· 💬 8
· 47 engagement
27 May
-
twitter
· @josephmooneymp
· quote
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 24
· ↻ 1
· 💬 3
· 35 engagement
25 May
-
twitter
· @josephmooneymp
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 1
· 3 engagement
18 Jun
-
twitter
· @josephmooneymp
· reply
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
27 May