Topic · social
Social Credit Scoring
3 posts
· 39 engagement
· first seen 25 May 2026
· last seen 9 Jun 2026
A reply questioning the fairness and public legitimacy of a social credit system that imposes a -500 penalty on an individual.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 3 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 3 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
3 posts
· 39 engagement
39
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @UCgrLRJJKj89Z8D5AcJeJzyA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 33
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 33 engagement
25 May
-
youtube
· @UCw08lDrHm2Bz7NgQdujcKQg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 6
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 6 engagement
25 May
-
youtube
· @UC9Jo12DQsSHvC1PeNV1sfPw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
9 Jun