Topic · social
Scientific Misinformation
11 posts
· 40 engagement
· first seen 29 Apr 2026
· last seen 17 Jun 2026
A reply that promotes climate change denial by citing Ian Plimer's discredited research, challenging the scientific consensus on climate change.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 11 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Supportive
5
Critical
5
Mocking
1
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 11 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
11 posts
· 40 engagement
40
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @UCo970kzLrrXoHxnliQxmxog
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 13
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 13 engagement
20 May
-
youtube
· @UCNJ5epP5gXNXPA9u-hAoCFg
· reply
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 7
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 7 engagement
20 May
-
youtube
· @UCf4tH6wwuYdZaLi54Z1Qx2g
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 6
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 6 engagement
5 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCxszrBVF-WqygDRGuH2_z0g
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 5
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 5 engagement
12 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCiPDl6fG94gzhsJRGpj7xjA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 4
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 4 engagement
19 May
-
youtube
· @UCEDJQl69_t36vzvi9TAV14w
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
16 May
-
youtube
· @UCrgcg5qUlGkzg6CPHwE109w
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
17 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCRpT_oMF4VxM5NoOXIf6NGA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
14 Jun