Topic · social
Royal Sovereignty
3 posts
· 464 engagement
· first seen 11 May 2026
· last seen 21 May 2026
The post argues that activists seeking justice at the King's Court are violating constitutional law by rejecting the Royal Sovereignty and the principles of the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 3 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 3 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
twitter
1 post
· 457 engagement
457
-
youtube
2 posts
· 7 engagement
7
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
twitter
· @HobsonsPledgeNZ
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 202
· ↻ 60
· 💬 45
· 457 engagement
11 May
-
youtube
· @UCn5AgJJfWxOyve6sAe9yOIA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 5
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 5 engagement
21 May
-
youtube
· @UC7t2Td5bEfTXQwpyxRGzW2w
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
21 May