Topic · social
Religious Exclusion From Policy
5 posts
· 8 engagement
· first seen 3 May 2026
· last seen 10 Jun 2026
The post criticizes the inclusion of religious references in public debate, advocating for a secular approach to policy and governance.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 5 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 5 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
twitter
1 post
· 7 engagement
7
-
youtube
4 posts
· 1 engagement
1
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
twitter
· @familyfirstnz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 5
· ↻ 1
· 💬 0
· 7 engagement
10 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCDh85n9ZRTv9Mkfw6AoRoZw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
18 May
-
youtube
· @UCzMG-NGlL0enyRy583ryLCA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
18 May
-
youtube
· @UCP-dlBpu6anJlAD39c4PcSQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
10 May
-
youtube
· @UCxr__DTUIObuks1wrhq38sQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
3 May