Topic · social
Rational Conversation Movement
6 posts
· 4 engagement
· first seen 21 May 2026
· last seen 17 Jun 2026
The post promotes the introduction of critical thinking and epistemological discussion in public conversations through the influence of Peter Boghossian and his work on street epistemology.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 6 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Supportive
4
Critical
1
Mocking
1
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 6 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
5 posts
· 4 engagement
4
-
twitter
1 post
· 0 engagement
0
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @UCJ4_-Cp1gpx-g0wDaRiNDXA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
15 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCNdTbFx9W_mNv_FP6aJSkXg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
14 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCuhyLqTuq4v_NOPIIbHh9Lw
· reply
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
23 May
-
youtube
· @UCUaewrJz7EVQYmnznS8uvkw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
17 Jun
-
twitter
· @josephmooneymp
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
3 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCVGEXCE1DtLQk6uhDIe65xw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
21 May