Topic · social
Political Dismissiveness
7 posts
· 142 engagement
· first seen 7 May 2026
· last seen 15 Jun 2026
The post uses sarcasm to dismiss political discourse, reflecting a tone of contempt or irony toward official engagement.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 7 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 7 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
7 posts
· 142 engagement
142
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @rnz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 43
· ↻ 0
· 💬 30
· 133 engagement
28 May
-
youtube
· @UCY56JQcALgmyKMrvGt5m23w
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 6
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 6 engagement
16 May
-
youtube
· @UCZb-rLf788GNnB18siSf0Pw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
13 May
-
youtube
· @UCpkGyp8gNF14o9KwAV1tjKQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
15 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCVNyng22SR6iPYudzEoZhQg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
29 May
-
youtube
· @UCIQZ9-pI4VFebn8NpYmEV5w
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
14 May
-
youtube
· @UCQQIxTmDofJ7p0wOd4L4Byg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
7 May