Topic · social
Opportunities Party Visibility
5 posts
· 559 engagement
· first seen 25 Jun 2026
· last seen 21 Aug 2026
A YouTube post by @theplatformnz features pollster David Farrar discussing the disproportionate and sympathetic media coverage given to the Opportunities Party, framing it as a case of media bias that creates visibility through negativity and publicity rather than substantive政策.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 3 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Supportive
1
Critical
1
Neutral / explainer
1
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 3 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Positive
1
Neutral
1
Negative
1
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
facebook
1 post
· 269 engagement
269
-
youtube
2 posts
· 0 engagement
0
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
facebook
· nzfirst
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 150
· ↻ 7
· 💬 35
· 269 engagement
18 Jul
-
youtube
· @UCBIXVmczHPEdB-DKCJPK4lw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
21 Aug
-
youtube
· @UCSy5IQOoQJTqBQQ50Xx_lEA
· reply
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
21 Jul