Topic · social
Neuroscience Credibility
2 posts
· 2 engagement
· first seen 15 May 2026
· last seen 24 May 2026
A reply questioning the reliability of a neuroscience expert's claim when both statements appear to be true, reflecting skepticism about expert credibility in public discourse.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
2 posts
· 2 engagement
2
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @UC6hqcvqcrdOdC_KSrnP6KaA
· reply
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
15 May
-
youtube
· @UCcH1Cql8EtFNP26t7oD0Nkw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
24 May