Topic · social
Mp Qualifications
4 posts
· 291 engagement
· first seen 12 May 2026
· last seen 15 Jun 2026
The post critiques the lack of clarity and professionalism among some MPs, particularly those on the left, and calls for higher standards of competence and qualification in political speech.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 4 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Supportive
2
Critical
1
Mocking
1
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 4 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
twitter
1 post
· 279 engagement
279
-
youtube
3 posts
· 12 engagement
12
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
twitter
· @drayeshaverrall
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 202
· ↻ 37
· 💬 1
· 279 engagement
14 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCOlxlLO_qtDJMlX0pmamN9w
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 9
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 9 engagement
15 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCz29NfNWrZ6V_q8r6TvgQKQ
· reply
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
12 May
-
youtube
· @UCrgcg5qUlGkzg6CPHwE109w
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
20 May