Topic · social
Judicial Bias
9 posts
· 52 engagement
· first seen 30 Apr 2026
· last seen 12 Jun 2026
A critical and sarcastic comment questioning transgender identity and suggesting judicial decisions are influenced by personal paraphilic tendencies.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 9 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 9 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
twitter
1 post
· 41 engagement
41
-
youtube
8 posts
· 11 engagement
11
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
twitter
· @bobmccoskrienz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 21
· ↻ 10
· 💬 0
· 41 engagement
19 May
-
youtube
· @UCgQmbBnHlweg1g3ifa086WA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
12 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCo-a2IPUycP1LYj0HX-ZwEA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
18 May
-
youtube
· @UCBeAJusZ1j-nETTOgqf22rQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
30 Apr
-
youtube
· @UCxxA6FZt7H5A6Yqc0ZVU2NQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
6 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCo9yX6GFqdOqzkJPLvj3ExA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
3 Jun
-
youtube
· @UC98f_yeDdEQzHekNkLVbEjQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
19 May
-
youtube
· @UC37jml3K1d_aTBohcYUfPjA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
17 May