Topic · social
Iran Nuclear Capabilities
7 posts
· 11 engagement
· first seen 30 Apr 2026
· last seen 8 Jun 2026
The post questions the validity of claims about Iran having nuclear weapons, advocating silence and non-involvement in the associated geopolitical drama.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 7 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Supportive
1
Critical
5
Neutral / explainer
1
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 7 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
7 posts
· 11 engagement
11
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @UCzBeyuqRpw3L4k2Gr0UGyjA
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 6
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 6 engagement
8 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCmz-XGcfZ1SVqs9HK4RhM6g
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
19 May
-
youtube
· @UCRPZ6BUiF1DRgsLpRWImZUQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
30 Apr
-
youtube
· @UChNGlntxQ4XowBuWLaK0OFg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
30 Apr
-
youtube
· @UC-rHBEB1UqLdqJcfgH0gc7A
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
5 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCQQIxTmDofJ7p0wOd4L4Byg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
21 May
-
youtube
· @UCYWx-x89ItxxBBf6BWfGuuQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
30 Apr