Topic · social
Ipcc Climate Models
7 posts
· 520 engagement
· first seen 7 Nov 2019
· last seen 28 May 2026
The post critiques the IPCC's use of parametrized climate models and the 2007 Supreme Court decision as foundations for climate change alarmism, arguing they have led to exaggerated and misleading narratives.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 6 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Supportive
1
Critical
4
Neutral / explainer
1
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 6 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
6 posts
· 520 engagement
520
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @the-platform-nz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 250
· ↻ 0
· 💬 82
· 496 engagement
20 May
-
youtube
· @reality-check-radio-nz
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 10
· ↻ 0
· 💬 2
· 16 engagement
20 May
-
youtube
· @reality-check-radio-nz
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 5
· ↻ 0
· 💬 1
· 8 engagement
28 May
-
youtube
· @UC9Jo12DQsSHvC1PeNV1sfPw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
20 May
-
youtube
· @UCanPtOhrzNMbBVhmxzAYpKQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
13 May
-
youtube
· @UChNGlntxQ4XowBuWLaK0OFg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
12 May