Topic · social
Intellectual Privilege In Politics
4 posts
· 7 engagement
· first seen 11 May 2026
· last seen 14 Jun 2026
The piece critiques a modern political campaign against ACT’s Regulatory Standards Bill, drawing parallels to the 1975 Citizens for Rowling effort, and argues that elite figures misuse their status to impose political views, undermining public trust and democratic engagement.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 4 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 4 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
4 posts
· 7 engagement
7
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @UC_jeU1Yq9sjdiCn4inNRWGQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 6
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 6 engagement
14 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCSItlu-GvoDmEQligDzk8LQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
19 May
-
youtube
· @UCxr__DTUIObuks1wrhq38sQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
20 May
-
youtube
· @UCUKmp0pVtm73Lq8RK9Pco0g
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
11 May