Topic · social
Identity Boundaries
3 posts
· 49 engagement
· first seen 10 May 2026
· last seen 21 May 2026
The post critically examines the meaning and implications of 'They are us' rhetoric in immigration discourse, arguing it reflects eliminationist thinking and justifies police harassment of critics.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 3 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 3 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
3 posts
· 49 engagement
49
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @reality-check-radio-nz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 33
· ↻ 0
· 💬 4
· 45 engagement
10 May
-
youtube
· @UC0MJWS0GZry6zpix89efW8g
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 4
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 4 engagement
20 May
-
youtube
· @UCVGEXCE1DtLQk6uhDIe65xw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
21 May