Topic · social
Farmers' Emissions Subsidy
12 posts
· 1,004 engagement
· first seen 21 May 2023
· last seen 17 Jun 2026
The post argues that wilding forests can generate significant profit through carbon sequestration, criticising DOC for mismanaging forest policy and highlighting the economic inefficiency of subsidizing agricultural emissions.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 10 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Supportive
1
Critical
8
Mocking
1
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 10 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
twitter
1 post
· 280 engagement
280
-
youtube
9 posts
· 7 engagement
7
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
twitter
· @TaxpayersUnion
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 135
· ↻ 50
· 💬 15
· 280 engagement
9 Jun
-
youtube
· @UC9zql8gYLkX_cGOMcSMH4yw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
12 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCb1wIZ-yZ386c1GZt9bEBlg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
3 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCP4UltG876I0FMxj78Lz5EQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
17 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCSTXCIE_Yhgh6_PvJqZuzhw
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
25 May
-
youtube
· @UCP4UltG876I0FMxj78Lz5EQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
17 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCP4UltG876I0FMxj78Lz5EQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
17 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCVVk3pixUumv5RuxF7EZtTg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
11 Jun