Topic · social
Constitutional Gender Policy
3 posts
· 734 engagement
· first seen 20 May 2026
· last seen 21 May 2026
The post critiques the National and ACT parties for not supporting a gender definition bill, while questioning Labour's engagement with the issue of legal gender definitions.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 3 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Critical
2
Neutral / explainer
1
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 3 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Positive
1
Neutral
1
Negative
1
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
twitter
3 posts
· 734 engagement
734
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
twitter
· @actparty
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 403
· ↻ 74
· 💬 58
· 725 engagement
21 May
-
twitter
· @familyfirstnz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 5
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 5 engagement
20 May
-
twitter
· @familyfirstnz
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 1
· 4 engagement
21 May