Topic · social
Act Party Initiative
7 posts
· 50 engagement
· first seen 6 Oct 2025
· last seen 3 Jun 2026
The post discusses the online harm inquiry led by ACT, arguing against immediate bans and emphasizing the need for careful consideration of expert and parental input before implementing social media regulation.
Stance breakdown
How the per-edge framings classify across 6 classified edges. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Sentiment breakdown
Whole-post emotional valence across 6 classified posts that reference this topic. Distinct from stance: a post can be supportive of the topic and still negative in tone (an angry supporter) — the two together capture the texture short-form posts compress into very few words.
Positive
2
Neutral
1
Negative
3
Platform mix
Where the conversation is happening. Engagement is volume-weighted (likes + 2×shares + 3×replies); a small number of high-impact posts can outrank a high-volume but low-engagement platform.
-
youtube
6 posts
· 40 engagement
40
Top posts by engagement
The most-engaged posts referencing this topic. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies; the order matches the digest ranking on /social.
-
youtube
· @UC435WmmyK8LjSwLASR0Wn4g
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 20
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 20 engagement
7 May
-
youtube
· @UCCfR52nTCjqZ1Rmm_v44NTw
· reply
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 15
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 15 engagement
11 May
-
youtube
· @UCnCkuKny4NAdAiCRU-F45kg
· reply
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
3 Jun
-
youtube
· @UChNGlntxQ4XowBuWLaK0OFg
· reply
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
19 May
-
youtube
· @UCNdTbFx9W_mNv_FP6aJSkXg
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
23 May
-
youtube
· @UCJw-rte2YlA2a3jrXd5C5rQ
· reply
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
6 May