A property mogul lost her Supreme Court appeal after citing non-existent legal cases, which were identified as AI hallucinations, and was ordered to pay costs.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by editorial lean. Stuff and The Spinoff lean centre-left, NZ Herald centre-right, others centre.
How press outlets have named this topic, week by week.
Most recent 2 articles linking to this topic.
Up to 12 framings spread across outlets. Each framing is the LLM's one-line characterisation of the article's editorial angle — not a quote.
court dismisses non-existent legal precedents in appeal
Property mogul’s last-ditch appeal fails after citing legal rulings that appeared to be AI hallucinationsSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.