The article reports on a proposed US policy requiring foreign tourists, including New Zealanders, to disclose five years of social media history for entry, with criticism that such a move reflects hypocrisy and threatens free speech, particularly targeting individuals like Phil G
Stacked weekly counts; colour by editorial lean. Stuff and The Spinoff lean centre-left, NZ Herald centre-right, others centre.
How press outlets have named this topic, week by week.
Most recent 3 articles linking to this topic.
Up to 12 framings spread across outlets. Each framing is the LLM's one-line characterisation of the article's editorial angle — not a quote.
banning critics contradicts democratic principles
Proposal for us to require five years of social media history hypocritical phil gofftest aims to affirm fundamental rights
‘Take it or leave it’: Luxon defends new citizenship examSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
