The Crown prosecutor in the murder trial of James Arthur Holder dismisses his self-defence argument as illogical, citing his prolonged possession of a loaded firearm, inconsistencies in his account, and the destruction of security footage, while the defence contends Holder was in
Stacked weekly counts; colour by editorial lean. Stuff and The Spinoff lean centre-left, NZ Herald centre-right, others centre.
How press outlets have named this topic, week by week.
Most recent 2 articles linking to this topic.
Up to 12 framings spread across outlets. Each framing is the LLM's one-line characterisation of the article's editorial angle — not a quote.
suggests intent to hide self-defence claim
Crown labels murder accused s self defence argument as untrue illogicalsecurity footage captures trespassing
CCTV shows man at outspoken councillor's home where security cameras pulled downSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.