The question of whether apologies effectively mitigate harm or resolve disputes, as examined in defamation appeals and personal relationship advice, often involving public figures.
Up to 12 framings across outlets and orientations — each a short phrase the extractor generated to characterise the piece's editorial angle (not a quote). Filter by lean to see how each bloc is spinning the story; click through to read the original.
limited remedy for public harm
‘Relentless attack’ or ‘fuel on the fire’? Brash v Hooton in the court of appealwhether apology suffices to negate damage
Matthew Hooton asks Court of Appeal to strike out Don Brash defamation caseStacked weekly counts; colour by editorial lean. Stuff and The Spinoff lean centre-left, NZ Herald centre-right, others centre.
How press outlets have named this topic, week by week.
Most recent 3 articles linking to this topic.
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.