Topic
Use Of Derogatory Terms In Public Discourse
8 items
· 7 aliases
· first seen 8 May 2026
The post critiques the use of a derogatory term to describe women in leadership, expressing disappointment and advocating for respectful language.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
8 social posts
·
2,090 engagement
Stance — 8 classified edges
Supportive
1
Critical
7
Sentiment — 8 classified posts
Negative
8
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
twitter
· @williejlabour
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 412
· ↻ 100
· 💬 204
· 1,224 engagement
11 May
-
twitter
· @nicolawillismp
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 352
· ↻ 14
· 💬 157
· 851 engagement
16 May
-
youtube
· @UC6hqcvqcrdOdC_KSrnP6KaA
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 8
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 8 engagement
7 May
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.