A podcast discussion critiques TVNZ's handling of the Maiki Sherman incident, arguing that the media should report on offensive behaviour by a senior journalist in the press gallery and that legal threats to suppress the story undermine journalistic independence and public trust.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Well, you have three examples, because if you actually go back and read the Annie O'Brien substack, there are three different examples of her behaviour, at least two that I'm aware of. And so that's a pattern of behaviour that was then tolerated. By the way, just speaking of the fact that you guys don't get a fair suck of the sav, that seemed to me really obvious the day that your poll came out, put the Prime Minister's party at 28.4 and TVNZ completely ignored it. Is that specific examples they just don't follow. Yeah.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
media accountability over corporate suppression
The Huddle: What do we think of TVNZ's conduct in the Maiki Sherman saga?Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
