A critical commentary on Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's alleged support for Trump's war in Iran, arguing it reflects poor judgment, a lack of understanding of public sentiment, and a departure from New Zealand's historically non-interventionist foreign policy.
How the framings classify across 6 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
To Washington, where our foreign minister has met with US Secretary of State Michael Rubio. No prizes for guessing what they talked about. Winston Peters is with us. Good morning. Broad-based question first of all, the sense of a major global capital in wartime, what's it feel like?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
use of historical context to critique imperial narratives
An open letter by Noelle McCarthy to the Scott Hamilton review of Charlotte GlennieSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
