Topic
Trans Pregnancy Protections
6 items
· 5 aliases
· peaked week of 7 Jun 2026
· first seen 31 May 2026
A critical post challenging the legal inclusion of trans men in pregnancy protections, arguing it is biologically flawed and based on misinformation.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
Free account
Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language.
Create a free account
Log in
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
5 social posts
·
2,649 engagement
Stance — 5 classified edges
Critical
5
Sentiment — 5 classified posts
Negative
5
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
facebook
· familyfirstnz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 977
· ↻ 157
· 💬 405
· 2,506 engagement
27 May
-
twitter
· @bobmccoskrienz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 71
· ↻ 18
· 💬 5
· 122 engagement
27 May
-
youtube
· @reality-check-radio-nz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 13
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 13 engagement
2 Jun
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.