New Zealand's government faces criticism for inconsistent messaging on whether it will purchase offshore carbon credits to meet its 2030 emissions target, with climate lawyers warning of trade and legal risks from appearing to backtrack on climate commitments.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
I think there's some real questions around that because uh not honouring our Paris Agreements uh obligations potentially actually has an impact on trade. So if you look at the European Union free trade agreement, our export industries, our farmers have really benefited from that. Not hitting our Paris Agreement uh obligations potentially compromises that. So we've got to hear a bit more from the government about okay, if they're not going to hit those targets and they're not going to buy international credits, how exactly are they going to meet the commitments that we've made internationally so that our export industries don't suffer because of our failure to do that?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
concern over international commitments and export harm
The Country 11/06/26: Chris Hipkins talks to Jamie MackaySpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
