The post promotes National Party's approach to trade deals as a means of increasing financial benefits for ordinary Kiwi families.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 1 article from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
It's certainly contingent on what the information shows. What we're worried about is there are some provisions in the agreement that are new. They're not in previous trade agreements and we're worried about the implications of some of those, particularly the requirement for New Zealand businesses to invest over $30 billion New Zealand dollars in India in the next 15 years or they'll claw back the provisions and the concessions that they're giving us. That is a concern. So the government's estimate. is that we'll get about a billion dollars a year worth of benefits while 30 billion dollars a year over 15 years that's two billion dollars going the other way so how is it that we basically to earn a dollar we have to spend two dollars this is the stuff that we're trying to understand
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
questioning whether deal is financially sustainable
Chris Hipkins: Labour leader says party waiting for legal advice before India trade deal decisionSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
