Topic
Supreme Court Democracy
4 items
· 3 aliases
· peaked week of 31 May 2026
· first seen 18 May 2026
A YouTube post by @theplatformnz argues that government intervention in climate policy is a democratic act, not an affront, and frames the Supreme Court's role as a threat to parliamentary supremacy and democracy.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
Free account
Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language.
Create a free account
Log in
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
3 social posts
·
375 engagement
Stance — 3 classified edges
Supportive
1
Critical
2
Sentiment — 3 classified posts
Positive
1
Neutral
2
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
youtube
· @the-platform-nz
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 221
· ↻ 0
· 💬 46
· 359 engagement
18 May
-
twitter
· @josephmooneymp
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 7
· ↻ 0
· 💬 2
· 13 engagement
13 May
-
twitter
· @theplatform_nz
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
18 May
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.