A report highlights that the West Auckland youth programme Rānui 135 delivers $4.86 in social value for every dollar invested, demonstrating strong long-term benefits for rangatahi in terms of wellbeing, education, and reduced negative outcomes.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 1 article from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
There's quite a lot that we would do differently. I certainly wouldn't have prioritised increasing rents for statehouse tenants. Um, because the accommodation supplement, which is where they're putting that money, by and large just flows through to increased rents and landlords benefit from that. There is real evidence that shows that those who are in accommodation supplement households pay higher rents than those who are in non-accommodation supplement households. So increasing the accommodation supplement by and large doesn't leave those families better off. It just means that they're probably going to face higher rent increases. Well, though that's one of the areas that we'll be looking at. We're going to go through the numbers pretty carefully before we set out our old our own alternative plans. But we will do that over the next few weeks and months.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
political window dressing with limited impact
**Social investment: Round 1: Government Wins, Children in Poverty Lose**Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
