Topic
Science Communication Ethics
11 items
· 4 aliases
· first seen 19 May 2026
The post warns against using AI to inform public policy, arguing that AI outputs are unreliable and potentially harmful, especially when based on false or misleading scientific claims.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
11 social posts
·
635 engagement
Stance — 11 classified edges
Supportive
5
Critical
4
Neutral / explainer
1
Mocking
1
Sentiment — 11 classified posts
Positive
1
Neutral
4
Negative
6
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
twitter
· @simoncourtact
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 258
· ↻ 40
· 💬 34
· 440 engagement
20 May
-
youtube
· @the-platform-nz
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 25
· ↻ 0
· 💬 30
· 115 engagement
20 May
-
reddit
· u/SkiSurfguy
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 5
· ↻ 0
· 💬 18
· 59 engagement
13 Jun
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.