The CTU submits a balanced critique of the Immigration (Enhanced Risk Management) Bill, opposing increased deportation liability and reduced appeal rights while supporting measures to address migrant exploitation.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
That is fair. And Immigration New Zealand got absolutely hauled over the coals and so should have the previous minister under Labour when we opened the borders from COVID and we just let in. Anyone, we literally closed our eyes and said, you know, welcome to New Zealand, we're not going to check your documents or do a proper risk management. That was a disaster. That's how we ended up with 70% low skilled migrants couldn't speak English, you know, brought all of their family and were then essentially exploited. What we've built over the last two years is proper risk management, proper verification. So and we've brought in things like English language requirements. You're not allowed to bring your family. I mean, if you're low skilled, you have to have the skill required to do the job, which we didn't have before. So with all that tightening up, we're just not getting the applicants who are the more dodgy
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
expanded state power and resident exclusion
A landmark US court ruling on birthright citizenship is coming. What does NZ law say?Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
