The article critiques the surge in donations to National, ACT, and NZ First parties, arguing that wealthy donors—particularly from the property industry—exert disproportionate influence over New Zealand politics, reflecting broader issues of wealth inequality and class-based bias
How the framings classify across 5 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
systemic financial dominance
Democracy Briefing: The NBR Rich List and the political donations of the very wealthysystemic bias in political finance
The NBR Rich List and the political donations of the very wealthySocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.