The use of sexist, gendered, or gender-dismissive language and remarks by or about politicians in New Zealand's political arena, including public debate over whether specific statements or conduct constitute sexism.
How the framings classify across 6 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Up to 12 framings across outlets and orientations — each a short phrase the extractor generated to characterise the piece's editorial angle (not a quote). Filter by lean to see how each bloc is spinning the story; click through to read the original.
criticised for sexist and demeaning language
Stuart Nash's fail shows a key calculation for Election 2026a strategic, reactive alignment with women's experiences
Amazing: National has finally discovered women existStacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
