This blog argues that New Zealand's approach to drug policy can be improved through deliberative democratic processes like a Citizens’ Assembly, which would enable citizens to engage with evidence and lived experience to develop nuanced, health-focused solutions, reducing politic
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
deeply rooted in fear and rhetoric, not evidence or empathy
\\ \\ 28 October 2025\\ \\ Blog\\ \\ **Democracy already in use against drug harm – why can’t politicians do the same?** \\ \\ This project has shown that New Zealand citizens can build consensus collectively, and reach sensible and nuanced solutions to reducing harm from drugs, with empathy, evidence, and health at their core.\\ \\ Can our politicians step up and do the same?\\ \\ D\\ \\ Dr. Rose CrossinSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.