This piece critiques New Zealand’s proposed legislation to legally define 'man' and 'woman' based on biology, arguing that it oversimplifies human diversity, ignores scientific complexity, and risks causing harm through exclusion and misapplication in areas like abortion and age-
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
metaphor for legislative overreach
A philosopher’s take on NZ’s bill to define who counts as a woman or manSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.