OpenBrief
Log in Sign up
What the picker changes
  • Top topics digest — the cards score the selected period against the prior 4 weeks.
  • 12-week heatmap & outlet matrix — show the 12 weeks ending at the selected week (they slide back with the picker, they aren’t a fixed snapshot).
  • Per-topic volume / alias drift — same 12-week trailing window, anchored on the selected period.
  • Coverage gap quadrant — scores the selected period against the 12 weeks before it (not including it).
  • Anomaly cards — only show alerts the detector fired during the selected period. Quiet weeks legitimately show none.
What stays as-is
  • Outlet orientation strip / lean colours — context-only, drawn from the last 12 weeks of activity regardless.
  • Co-occurrence graph — recent-activity anchored, not picker-driven.
  • Source & topic profiles — all-time data for the topic; the picker doesn’t affect them.
Rolling 7 days is a sliding live window for “current vibes”; switch to Weekly to compare specific weeks side-by-side.
live window
Topic

New Zealand First Regional Fund Misuse

2 items · 2 aliases · peaked week of 31 May 2026 · first seen 2 Jun 2026

A political podcast discusses small business telecom costs, government spending controversies involving Winston Peters and New Zealand First, the acquisition of Green Cross Health by a private health tech firm, and debates over superannuation reform and primary care corporatizati

Volume by source orientation Methodology →

Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.

Alias drift

How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.

Free account Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge. Create a free account Log in

Heard on radio

Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.

  • 525. So all the talk this weekend was about our defense strategy, whether we're free loaders about whether we should have a conversation about allowing nuclear propelled vessel vessels into our ports. But there were a few other things that were discussed in Singapore. Uh the AUKUS partners, including us, because we're sort of flirting with Pillar 2, agreed to commence a program to construct underwater drone submarines to remotely control uh remotely controlled to patrol the deep and protect the wires that connect the world. I thought this was amazing. This shows the changing face of warfare, which is changing at a rapid pace. The hostilities in the Straits of Hormuz, what have I got there? Drone speedboats, the hostilities in Ukraine. Did you see the tally last night? Those drones are amazing and they're cheap. The future of warfare is not in big war machines, but rather this cheaper drone technology uh controlled by a laptop and not a huge mainframe. And meanwhile, there has been talk in New Zealand that rather than buying new frigates, we may actually refurbish our existing stock. And in the latest budget, there was also money put aside to develop new drone capabilities. Okay? So that's the future. And all the debate, everyone's going, we need to buy a couple of extra frigates. I don't think that's going to happen. I think we're going to buy an awful lot of drones. And meanwhile, the summit in Singapore also talked about what Australia has to do for AUKUS. You might have heard the Prime Minister saying, well, Australia won't have nuclear propelled submarines until 2040. But there's a new rotational plan that's starting in 2027, where nuclear propelled and nuclear-armed warships will have a program where they vi regularly visit Port Sterling, which is in Western Australia, I believe, but it's certainly in Australia. And they're going to do they're going to be going there all the time. And this is to help Australia develop the ability to run a nuclear fleet. And if involved in military exercises in the South Pacific Ocean, it seems logical to me to assume that we will be asked for visits sooner rather than later, and this all starts in 2027. So look, I think we can be justifiably proud of our non-nuclear stance over the last 40 years. And according to a stuff poll out today, 70% of us are. But it also seems to me, with the world as it is, that it's becoming increasingly delusional to ban not uh nuclear propulsion and what is an increasingly militaristic world.
Free account Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language. Create a free account Log in

Sample framings

Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.

hdpa-drive Government / N-A

taxpayer funds diverted to political patronage

Full Show Podcast: 02 June 2026
2 Jun
hdpa-drive Government / N-A

taxpayer-funded regional development concerns

Perspective with Andrew Dickens: Here's one thing we shouldn't forget about Winston Peters
2 Jun
Free account Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language. Create a free account Log in

Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.