A podcast discussion featuring Brent Eccles highlights the government's proposed extension of copyright protection for New Zealand music from 50 to 70 years, emphasizing its importance in supporting local artists and ensuring lasting royalties for songwriters and their estates.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Oh, I think so. But anything to protect New Zealand uh music business is is a good thing and to protect the writers. Um if you're gonna make any money in this music bus in the music business, writing songs is really where it's at. And having having a protection is a good thing.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
longer protection benefits songwriters and estates
Brent Eccles: Eccles Entertainment Founder on the Government's move to adjust the Copyright Act to extend protection for Kiwi musicSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
