The article examines the dispute between Winston Peters and Christopher Luxon over whether the New Zealand-India free trade agreement facilitates significant immigration, highlighting conflicting claims about visa numbers and migration impacts, while analyzing the actual terms of
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
no surprise at all. I'm surprised it took them so long, although not surprised really, because what they're doing is simply plain and simple politicking in the lead up to the election. What they've done though is they've given some credence to the claims that have been made by New Zealand First. Not the... not the immigration claims, although they're a little concerned about that, but it's the other claims and mainly the one that they've got to drum up New Zealand and India $20 billion US over 15 years of interest in that country. Now, I think, frankly, if you look at the China Free Trade Agreement, I think they can achieve that, not comfortably, but it'll be a bit of a push. If you look at the China agreement now, I looked at the figures, the latest figures, $41 billion is a two-way trade between China and New Zealand. 22 billions of that comes from New Zealand exporters. So it's trade in our favour. Now you've got the biggest populous country in the world, India, again getting into bed with New Zealand. You can't say that's a bad thing. And I think certainly not before time they essentially agreed to it, thank goodness for
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
