A podcast discussion on the proposed New Zealand citizenship value test, examining its potential political bias, effectiveness in filtering migrants, and the distinction between value pledges and factual knowledge, while also touching on economic conditions and the removal of the
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
On the huddle with us this evening, Jack Tame, host of Saturday Mornings and Q&A and fellow Riley Iron Duke partners and former Business New Zealand chief executive. Hi lads. Good, thank you, Phil. Thanks for asking. Jack, how do you feel about this test? Um, I thought it was really interesting that in your first question, the minister answered by talking about us saying it was time for us to be proud about who we are in New Zealand. It's time for us to be proud about our values. I mean, I'm yet to be convinced of the utility of the test. If there are 20 questions and they're all pretty obvious stuff about rights and freedom, I would have thought that for any prospective migrant or citizen in New Zealand who spent enough time here, they're either going to know these like the back of their hand or.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
distinguishing between knowledge and personal belief
The Huddle: Do we agree with the new NZ citizenship test?Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
