A discussion on a podcast critiques political figures, particularly Shane Jones, for making personal and gendered comments about Nicola Willis's weight, arguing it is inappropriate, reflects a broader pattern of male dominance in politics, and undermines public trust and social尊严
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
I would agree with that. Now, Carmen, both Chris Hipkins and Shane Jones have today, well today and yesterday, made comments about Nicola Willis's weight loss. Where do you fall on this? Is this personal to her and should not be discussed unless she's prepared to discuss it or is it fair game because it's so bloody obvious?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
pattern of gendered double standards
The Huddle: Were the comments about Nicola Willis out of line?Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.