A political analysis arguing that Chris Luxon's leadership is likely to end before the election due to poor national party polling, economic deterioration, and ongoing media attacks, with a call for a strategic leadership change to preserve the party's viability.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
The economy has to improve. Is our economy going to improve between now and November? No, it's not going to happen. In fact, our economy is probably going to get crushed further by Iran in the fuel crisis. So the most likely scenario we're now facing is the economy gets worse, therefore national's polling gets worse, therefore those 11 MPs and maybe even more lose their jobs come November. Meanwhile, this ongoing destabilising campaign that we saw in the Herald today continues. Someone is deliberately continuously planting stories in the media. Right, that will continue to happen. That's not going to stop. It will drive the polls down further. It will make Luxon look even more like a lame duck prime minister. This destabilising will keep happening. So what happens then, right, if we assume the economy doesn't get better, the polling doesn't get better, the destabilising continues, is that maybe three months out from the election, in the depths of winter, the National Party loses its nerve and rolls Chris Luxon out of desperation to save the furniture. I see no way. That anything else happens. So let's say that's scenario number one. They can now hope and pray they can do that. It's a strategy. Maybe, just maybe, something miraculous happens that saves their butts like COVID saved Jacinda in 2020. But that is hope and prayer stuff. Second scenario is they pull the pin. They pull the pin, they switch Chris Luxon out for someone else. They call an early election for that person to seek a mandate while that person still has a honeymoon period and before winter and the Iran crisis make us even more miserable than we already are. Now, if I was the National Party caucus, I would be going for the second option because, as I say, I reckon the polling is now so consistently bad that the leadership change is going to happen anyway before the election. They can only choose when and how messy they let it get.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
deliberate and damaging
Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: Maths doesn't lie - Luxon is outSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.