Topic
Media Bias In Treaty Coverage
4 items
· 3 aliases
· peaked week of 26 Apr 2026
· first seen 29 Apr 2026
The piece critiques media coverage and submission data around the Treaty Principles Bill, arguing that opposition numbers are inflated, tactics to manipulate submissions are exposed, and a referendum is needed to ensure genuine public input on Treaty principles.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
systematically amplifies grievance over factual accuracy
The Update
28 Apr
Free account
Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language.
Create a free account
Log in
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
3 social posts
·
2 engagement
Stance — 3 classified edges
Critical
2
Neutral / explainer
1
Sentiment — 3 classified posts
Negative
3
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
youtube
· @UC2UAaF4eBPcFY9lGxXzF_vw
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 2
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 2 engagement
10 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCd-KzaJGVGLAy5W7S7c8khQ
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
28 May
-
youtube
· @UCd-KzaJGVGLAy5W7S7c8khQ
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
28 May
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.