The article explores how means testing works in international retirement systems, using examples from the UK, Denmark, Canada, and Singapore, to inform concerns about potential future changes to New Zealand's Superannuation system.
How the framings classify across 4 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 2 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
So the OECD had a word about New Zealand Inc yesterday. They've weighed in on the super debate. Of course they want eligibility linked to life expectancy. We had eventually to 69. Also some means testing for the top 10% of earners. Nicola Willis, Finance Minister back with us. Morning. How is Singapore?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
fairness vs. regressive impact in retirement policy
The superannuation debate is back – but reform looks like a non-starterSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
