A podcast discussion presents a report advocating for housing policy reform by replacing political housing targets with price-based indicators and emphasizing the role of technical urban economic experts to guide cities rather than planners or politicians.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Uh I I agree with you that urban planners are not the people not the right people to make choices for other people. What they can do is they can separate what's public from what's private, so they have a job, but uh they need to get out of the market, and they have been destroying the market because they're not looking at the economics.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
real demand vs artificial scarcity created by rules
Benno Blaschke: NZ Initiative Research Fellow on the suggestion to replace housing targets with price indicators, remove politics from housingSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
