The piece discusses the potential for a coalition between Australia's opposition and One Nation, framed by polling data and political strategy, while drawing parallels to New Zealand's Māori Party and questioning the viability of such alliances.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
But Mars, isn't she kind of a little bit like the Māori Party in New Zealand, so toxic at one end of the spectrum that it's gonna kind of chase away that middle voter you actually need to win the election. So they really don't want her part of the part of the mix, do they?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
toxicity risks alienating mainstream voters
Murray Olds: Australian correspondent on opposition leader Angus Taylor leaving door open for One Nation partnershipSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.