The New Zealand government faces scrutiny over its liquefied natural gas import facility levy, with officials warning it could be passed on to consumers through increased energy costs.
How the framings classify across 12 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 7 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
So the government's scrapping plans for a levy read tax to pay for the billion dollar LNG import terminal. They haven't been very clear though on how it will be funded. It expects to sign a contract with a provider later in this year. So to talk about this and the funding, I'm joined by Energy Minister Simeon Brown. Hello, Simeon. First of all, why no levy?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
user pays, no blanket levy
Power firms to fund LNG port through user pays – but effect is the same for consumersSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
